26 FBI Informants, Hidden Agendas, and Wray's Deception: What the Media Won't Tell You About January 6

In a revelation that shakes the foundations of the already questionable narrative surrounding January 6, a new Inspector General report has uncovered the presence of 26 FBI confidential informants embedded within the crowd that gathered at the Capitol that day. This stunning disclosure calls into question the honesty of FBI Director Christopher Wray and highlights how Democrats and their mainstream media allies may have distorted the events for political gain.

The FBI’s Network Inside the Capitol

The IG report paints a picture that many suspected but few could confirm until now. Twenty-six confidential informants from the FBI were in Washington, D.C., during the January 6 protest. Among them, four individuals entered the Capitol building itself, while 13 occupied restricted areas. These numbers are not insignificant—they suggest a deeply embedded FBI presence on the ground. Yet, despite these facts, Wray has repeatedly downplayed or outright dismissed claims of FBI involvement.

Perhaps most damning is the fact that this presence was kept under wraps. It wasn’t until this report that the public learned of the extent of the FBI’s operations that day. What else is being concealed?

A Web of Deception

Director Wray’s public statements regarding January 6 now warrant serious scrutiny. During congressional testimony, Wray described the attack as “domestic terrorism” and refuted claims that the FBI played any role in instigating violence. However, his choice of words and careful omissions reveal a pattern of deception. While Wray stopped short of outright lying, his calculated phrasing allowed the media and Democrats to perpetuate their preferred narrative: that the events of January 6 were a direct assault on democracy orchestrated by Trump supporters alone.

Yet, this report reveals that the FBI’s informants were deeply entrenched in the crowd. Even more troubling, four informants breached the Capitol itself. Were they passive observers, or did their presence influence the actions of others? These are questions Wray has so far refused to address.

The Media’s Role in the Cover-Up

The mainstream media, as ever, played their part in obfuscating the truth. From the outset, networks like CNN and MSNBC framed January 6 as an insurrection masterminded by Trump supporters—an existential threat to democracy. Conveniently absent from their coverage was any mention of federal informants or the FBI’s involvement. Instead, they focused on perpetuating fear and advancing the Democratic Party’s agenda.

This omission isn’t accidental. The presence of FBI informants would have complicated their narrative and raised uncomfortable questions about the true nature of the events. It’s much easier to pin the blame entirely on Trump and his supporters than to admit the situation is far more complex than they let on.

What Really Happened on January 6?

The discovery of FBI informants casts doubt on nearly every aspect of the official narrative. Was January 6 truly a spontaneous uprising, or were elements of it facilitated, even unintentionally, by federal involvement? If informants were present, what intelligence did they provide before the events unfolded? And why was this information withheld from the public for nearly three years?

Critically, the IG report found no evidence that FBI informants were instructed to incite violence. However, their presence alone raises serious concerns. If their purpose was to gather intelligence, why did they fail to prevent the breach? This failure, whether intentional or negligent, demands accountability from FBI leadership, starting with Wray.

A Political Tool

Beyond the FBI’s actions, the aftermath of January 6 has been weaponized by Democrats and the media to consolidate power and demonize political opponents. The rhetoric of “insurrection” has justified unprecedented crackdowns on civil liberties, from enhanced surveillance to the targeting of conservatives under the guise of combating “domestic terrorism.”

This narrative has also been used to smear Trump supporters as extremists while conveniently ignoring the role of federal agencies. The IG report’s findings expose this hypocrisy. If the FBI had such a significant presence, why were their actions excluded from the public discourse? The answer is clear: admitting federal involvement would undermine the Democrats’ carefully constructed story.

Wrapping Up the Lies

The Inspector General’s report is a stark reminder of how far the political establishment and their media allies will go to control the narrative. It’s not just about January 6; it’s about trust in our institutions. Director Wray and the FBI must answer for their actions, and the public deserves the full truth.

As the facts come to light, it becomes increasingly clear that January 6 was not the simple story of good versus evil that Democrats and the media wanted us to believe. The involvement of FBI informants adds a layer of complexity that demands further investigation. Above all, it exposes the dishonesty of those who sought to exploit this tragedy for political gain.

It’s time to demand accountability—not just from the FBI, but from every institution and individual who perpetuated this grand deception. The American people deserve nothing less.