Daniel Penny Acquitted: A Hero Who Should Never Have Been Put on Trial

The verdict is in: Daniel Penny, the former U.S. Marine who stepped in to protect terrified passengers on a New York City subway, has been found not guilty of criminally negligent homicide in the death of Jordan Neely. The jury’s decision, announced after days of deliberation, was the only logical conclusion to a case that should never have gone to trial in the first place. Daniel Penny is not a criminal—he is a hero.

The events that led to this trial unfolded in May 2023 on a packed subway train, where Neely, a homeless man with a long history of mental illness and violent outbursts, began threatening passengers. Witnesses testified that Neely screamed about wanting to harm others and hurled objects, creating an atmosphere of fear and panic. Penny, a 24-year-old Marine veteran, stepped forward when others froze, placing Neely in a chokehold to subdue him. Two other passengers assisted in restraining Neely, underscoring the palpable danger felt by everyone in the car.

When first responders arrived, Neely was unconscious and later pronounced dead. The city’s medical examiner ruled the death a homicide due to neck compression, and a narrative quickly emerged that vilified Penny. Critics branded him a vigilante, accusing him of excessive force. Yet the overwhelming evidence, corroborated by passenger testimony, painted a very different picture: Penny acted to protect himself and others from what he reasonably perceived as an imminent threat.

Despite the clear justification for Penny’s actions, prosecutors decided to pursue charges, bowing to political pressure and public outcry. This decision thrust Penny into the national spotlight, forcing him to defend his life-saving actions in a court of law. It was a travesty of justice that he was charged at all.

Throughout the trial, Penny’s defense team effectively dismantled the prosecution’s case. Witness after witness testified to the terror Neely instilled in the subway car that day. Passengers described feeling helpless and fearing for their safety before Penny intervened. Even the medical evidence presented by the prosecution failed to conclusively prove that Penny’s actions alone caused Neely’s death. Defense experts argued that Neely’s underlying health conditions, including malnutrition and heart issues, were significant contributing factors.

The jury deliberated for four days, weighing the chaotic circumstances of the subway incident against the prosecution’s claim that Penny’s actions were reckless. Their not-guilty verdict is a vindication of common sense and a reaffirmation of the right to self-defense. Penny acted to protect others in a dangerous, high-pressure situation—a choice that should be celebrated, not criminalized.

The broader implications of this case cannot be ignored. The prosecution of Daniel Penny sent a chilling message to anyone considering stepping up in the face of danger. It told citizens that even when their actions are justified, they could face the full weight of the legal system if they dare to intervene. This is the wrong message for a society grappling with rising crime and diminishing public safety.

Daniel Penny’s ordeal is also a stark reminder of the failures of the systems that allowed this tragedy to occur in the first place. Jordan Neely’s life was a long, painful descent marked by personal tragedy and untreated mental illness. Once a beloved Michael Jackson impersonator, Neely struggled with severe psychological issues following the murder of his mother. His violent outbursts and history of arrests were well-documented, yet he received little meaningful intervention. The system failed Neely long before he encountered Daniel Penny.

Penny’s acquittal is a moment of relief and justice, but it should also serve as a call to action. New York City—and the nation as a whole—must confront the root causes of the homelessness and mental health crises that led to this tragedy. People like Neely should not be left to spiral out of control in public spaces, creating situations that endanger themselves and others. These issues demand comprehensive solutions, not scapegoating individuals who act in good faith to protect others.

As the dust settles on this case, Daniel Penny’s name will forever be associated with a courageous act that saved lives, even as it cost him dearly. He endured public scrutiny, legal battles, and personal attacks, all for doing what countless others would have done in his place. Penny did not deserve to be vilified or put on trial. He deserves gratitude.

In a brief statement after the verdict, Penny expressed his relief and extended his thoughts to Neely’s family, underscoring his humanity and the regret he feels about the tragic outcome. But while Penny moves on to rebuild his life, the broader lessons of this case remain. Society owes him—and every other good Samaritan who steps up in times of crisis—a clear and unwavering message: You will not be punished for doing the right thing.

The acquittal of Daniel Penny is not just a victory for him; it is a victory for common sense, justice, and the fundamental right to defend oneself and others. Let this case be a turning point—a reminder that heroes should be celebrated, not prosecuted.

Please leave your opinions / comments on these stories below, we appreciate your perspective!