HOUSTON — This story was brought to my attention by Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and it’s a gut punch we need to feel.
She has done excellent work blowing the whistle on vaccine safety and what she has uncovered here, by way of the March 24, 2025 article by Dr. Peter McCullough and John Leake on America Out Loud News, is bone-chilling.
It’s called “Behind the Numbers: Miscarriages Post-COVID Shots,” and it sets out a reality the CDC and Big Pharma don’t want us to know: miscarriages have soared after COVID-19 vaccines started rolling out. This isn’t conspiracy talk. It’s data, experience, and a wake-up call.
A Florida OB-GYN with 15 years under her belt, Dr. Kimberly Biss, just exposed the truth in an interview with McCullough. Her practice’s miscarriage rate was stable at 4% in 2020, before the jab arrived. By early 2023, that number was 20% to 30%.
She witnessed it herself: healthy pregnancies resulting in loss, irregular bleeding, premature childbirth, all spiking after 2021, when the vaccines became routine. Biss isn’t some fringe voice. She’s on the front lines, and her numbers scream something’s wrong.
McCullough and Leake go further, citing a 2021 study by Shimabukuro in the New England Journal of Medicine that was pulled for massaging the truth. It masked the true risk of miscarriage, they say, by avoiding later-term losses and then displaying a sanitized 12.6 percent rate that doesn’t tell the full tale.
And there’s Naomi Wolf’s deep dive into Pfizer’s post-marketing data: 270 pregnant women vaccinated, and 34 have known outcomes and of those, 23 lost their infants. That’s a loss rate of 81 percent. You don’t need a PhD. to see that’s horrific. The authors connect it to the spike protein, perhaps inflaming placentas, killing pregnancies. It’s a theory, sure, but it’s consistent with what Biss observed.
The CDC says it’s all fine; it says miscarriage rates range from 10% to 20% naturally with no connection to the vaccine. ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists) has their backs with a 2021 Human Reproduction study monitoring 149,685 women with the overwhelming 9% rate, risk ratio of 1.07.
They say Biss’s jump is an aberration, and the Pfizer data’s misread. But that 81% isn’t a typo. But it wasn’t made up by Wolf, that is in the documents. Biss isn’t alone in that—her experience parallels whispers from other corners, real stories of loss that don’t fit the official line.
Dr. Boyd has been a bulldog about this, raising the alarm about vaccine risks while others have kept mum. She’s gone to bat for patients, and took heat for it, and now she’s putting a spotlight on this miscarriage fiasco.
We’re talking about it because of her courage. The TGA in Australia merely repeats the CDC: the vaccines are safe and adverse events are rare. But Biss’s patient numbers jump from 4% to 30% ain’t uncommon. It’s a red flag. If the shots were safe, why the leap?
The counterarguments are weak. The studies in human reproduction? Big numbers, sure, but it’s retrospective, easy to massage. The CDC’s 2023 report that there was no spike? They have control over the data, so naturally it’s clean.
Biss, meanwhile, was witnessing it unfold in real time — patients losing babies, month after month. Wolf’s 81% may only be a small sample, but it’s Pfizer’s own numbers, not some blog post.
The spike protein theory holds water, too; studies like this Nature one from 2021 demonstrate it can cross barriers, hit organs. Placenta’s not a stretch.
This isn’t an excercise in fearmongering. It’s about truth. Women should know what they’re risking. The CDC’s 10-20% baseline is a dodge—Biss’s baseline was 4%, and it skyrocketed post-vaccine.
That’s not normal variation. That’s a signal. McCullough, an experienced cardiologist, and Leake, an astute writer, are not making this up. They’re echoing Biss, who’s lived through it. Bowden should be applauded for getting this out there. She’s more than a whistleblower; she’s a lifeline for the overlooked.
We have to ask: What’s with the silence? And if it’s so safe, why the differences? Why the studies that were retracted, the data that was buried? This isn’t settled science. It’s a cover-up, and the toll is lives, most of all unborn ones. Biss’s 20-30% is a warning. Wolf’s 81% is a siren. The work of Bowden is the megaphone. Time to listen.
Please leave your opinions / comments on these stories below, we appreciate your perspective!
