Mainstream Media Finally Admits to Ignoring Biden's Cognitive Decline

In a startling but overdue turn of events, the mainstream media is beginning to confront its own failure to address President Joe Biden's cognitive decline. CBS News correspondent Jan Crawford has called the lack of coverage surrounding Biden’s mental fitness one of the most underreported stories of 2024, reigniting a discussion that many argue should have been front and center years ago.

During a recent broadcast, Crawford highlighted that Biden’s cognitive struggles, which were evident during a televised presidential debate, were blatantly ignored by much of the mainstream press. While conservative outlets and independent journalists had long raised concerns about the president’s mental acuity, these warnings were largely dismissed or labeled as partisan attacks. Now, even legacy outlets like The Washington Post have begun to acknowledge that Biden's mental state has been a persistent and growing issue.

The Media’s Long Silence

The signs of Biden's cognitive challenges have been visible for years—his frequent verbal gaffes, instances of apparent confusion, and public struggles to recall details have been documented extensively. Despite these red flags, most major media outlets chose to sidestep the issue, focusing instead on protecting his image during the 2020 campaign and his presidency. Critics argue that this silence wasn’t just journalistic malpractice but a deliberate effort to shield Biden from scrutiny that could have derailed his political ambitions.

Now, as Biden's presidency winds down, the media’s sudden willingness to discuss his cognitive decline raises questions about their motives. Is this a genuine attempt at accountability, or a calculated pivot to distance themselves from a leader whose term has been marred by crises and controversies?

Implications for Media Ethics and Transparency

Crawford’s admission underscores a deeper issue within the media landscape: the prioritization of political agendas over public accountability. By failing to address Biden’s cognitive health sooner, the media not only failed the American public but also abdicated its responsibility to hold those in power accountable.

This revelation also raises significant ethical concerns. How much did voters truly know about Biden's capabilities when casting their ballots? Would greater transparency about his mental fitness have altered the outcome of the 2020 or 2024 elections? These are questions that the media must grapple with as it attempts to rebuild its credibility in the eyes of a skeptical public.

The Political Fallout

The newfound focus on Biden's cognitive decline is sure to have far-reaching political consequences. It provides fresh ammunition for critics who have long argued that the president was unfit for office. It also casts doubt on the integrity of the Democratic Party, which nominated and supported Biden despite clear evidence of his struggles.

For the American public, this acknowledgment by mainstream media may come as too little, too late. The lack of early, honest coverage has already shaped the trajectory of Biden’s presidency and, by extension, the nation’s future.

A Warning for the Future

The media’s handling of Biden’s cognitive decline serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of partisan journalism and the consequences of prioritizing narrative over truth. As the 2024 political landscape shifts, it remains to be seen whether this moment of self-reflection will lead to meaningful changes in how the press covers critical issues—or if it’s simply a convenient way to rewrite history.

For now, the admission stands as a stark reminder of how far the media has strayed from its role as a watchdog for the public good. Whether this acknowledgment marks the beginning of a new era of transparency or just another chapter in a long history of selective reporting remains to be seen.

Please leave your opinions / comments on these stories below, we appreciate your perspective!